This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This kind of "social pride" seems really fundamental to pretty much any polity, but I wonder if there hasn't always been an equally strong counter-current, particularly in America. At some point what was "working out for us" one way or the other changed. Racial integration, overall secularity, and the form of gender egalitarianism we see now are not historically American norms. One might argue that liberalism itself is a seed that inevitably flowers into what we see now in terms of "neutral", but I think one of the things that makes America peculiar is that there has always been an incredible ambivalence about how "liberalism" is going to be played out.
A lot of this is simply because liberalism itself is a weird Frankenstein of a political ideology that erupts out of the dis-integration of Christendom, and so we keep seeing grabs for different kind of power emphasizing different kinds of Christian virtue as absolute (mercy, self-sacrifice, autonomy, kindness etc.) But the point is that what is ideologically homogenous now is and always has been implicitly understood as extremely volatile and prone to fragmentation.
It really does feel like we've seen a kind of "natural progression" of liberalism from, say, the 60s up until now with certain kinds of emphasis on civil liberties, but so long as one "virtue" is emphasized to the exclusion of others, there will always be be a counter-current attempting the homeostasis of something like the high Middle Ages. It's like an involuntary immune system response, and it won't change so long as liberalism is our fundamental ideology.
All this to say, it might be that the undercurrent of what the right is feeling right now is that aforementioned autoimmune response to de-homogenize, or to even point out that such homogeneity isn't even real in the first place (ie, fake news, Psy-ops, mainstream media etc.).
More options
Context Copy link