This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Lies. Japan denies culpability for its assorted war crimes in the second world war to this day.
It's amazing to me that you consider this a relevant analogy. The entire reason the invasion of Iraq wasn't justified was because the Iraqis weren't responsible for 9/11. It was a ginned-up casus belli. The Palestinians were responsible for October 7th. Do you really not understand how these two situations are incomparable, or are you just pretending not to?
Dying to see a source on this one.
So you claim that your preferred solution is for a single-state solution in which Israel is renamed to Palestine. And yet, it cheers you up to learn that lots of people want the Israelis to pack up and move elsewhere. Why would that be the case, if it isn't your preferred solution? Dare I say you're not being entirely truthful about what your preferred solution is?
Of all the obnoxious rhetorical strategies pro-Palestine activists use, Holocaust appropriation must be the most distasteful. Other Arabs are a far bigger threat to Arabs than Israel has ever been.
But even leaving aside the relative death tolls, the reason this analogy doesn't work is because, prior to the Nazis, relations between Jews and Germans were fairly cordial, as evidenced by the fact that there were hundreds of thousands of Jews living inside Germany at the time. But Arabs hate Israelis now, and also hated them in 1948, before Israel had even been founded (back when they were just called "Jews"). You claim that Arabs hate Israelis as an inevitable consequence of decades of mistreatment, but they already hated them before any of this mistreatment. Am I supposed to pretend that this is just a coincidence? As ever, I find myself irresistibly drawn to the conclusion that this is an ethno-religious conflict dressed up as an anti-colonial one.
Hello! I've only recently returned from a holiday/retreat, where I wasn't able to access the Motte. I'm more than happy to continue this conversation but it has been a week, so I'd rather ask if you wanted to pick it back up first before I respond.
I feel like we're just talking past each other and it's not a very productive discussion. Thank you for offering your perspective and I hope you enjoyed your holiday.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link