site banner
PaperclipPerfector  26d ago (text post)   24937 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 27, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're called "snark" subreddits. Null has complained a few times about how they get away with harassment that would be immediately banworthy on Kiwi Farms.

Reddit is letting the h3 snark get away with shit I'd perma ban people for straight up no questions asked. That's how fucked the Internet is. It's just about how much money you make. If we made reddit money, I could let users get away with fucking murder.

Bro, do you seriously think Kiwi farms is a more rigid environment than reddit? Do you seriously think communities on reddit can organize CPS calls openly? Do you seriously think communities on reddit can organize CPS calls openly? Doxxing and personal information is banable, you can't even post a screenshot with someone's username on it because they consider that harassment. The whole point of Kiwi farms is that is not as anal and rigid as these other sites. Kiwifarms doesn't allow calls to action, that's it, everything else that is legal is allowed.

Yes. I've repeatedly seen snark subs get away with murder you'd instantly get reported and banned for on the kiwi farms.

Non-Null quote regarding H3H3's lawsuit against the moderators of that group's snark subreddit:

very bizarre to see people in this thread joyfully celebrating the fact that a Professional Internet Faggot got a judge's permission to dox and sue Redditors for being mean to him on the internet. I wonder if our friend Mr. Elliot Fong is paying attention.

Nigga the anti-H3 people sent him skulls in the mail, tried to get his kids taken away, and people on h3snark were taking credit for it and openly bragging about it. That shit is straight up illegal and he is well within his rights to subpoena reddit for the names of the people who moderated the communities where that behavior happened and encouraged it. This is true regardless of your opinion on Ethan.

perhaps you have forgotten kiwifarms' status as The Most Hated Forum. baseless accusations of defamation or harassment can and have been used effectively against this site and its user base.

Kiwi Farms, as far as I know, has not sent people human skulls in the mail or tried to call CPS with the intent of wrongfully getting someone's kids taken away.

You're making an argument that this is setting bad precedent, but the kind of person who would spread lies in order to destroy this site a-la Keffals during DKF don't need that precedent. It already happened and did not involve use of the law. I repeat my statement that there is literally nothing wrong with going through the proper legal channels to obtain the identities of people who tried to fuck with you and your family so that you can sue them.

If Null thought this sort of thing would hurt the site in some way, he wouldn't be featuring it himself: [screenshot of thread's being featured on Kiwi Farms front page]

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats