This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You are making the maximally antagonistic accusations against people to maintain an argument. That just doesn't track with me when I try to relate this to actual people. I'm not under the impression that every man or woman is perfect. No system fits all. But when we are doing a compare and contrast with the goal of finding a solution to an existential problem you have to give some form of answer that doesn't just amount to 'boo outgroup'.
If you think modern Korea is trad or that Poland isn't socially liberal, or that the TFR of Poland is in any relevant way worse than Sweden or France after accounting for immigration, you need to recalibrate.
How will the rejection of traditional gender roles impact warfare in a way that reduces the need for cannon fodder? Won't the nations that maintain a strong army just get ever stronger if other nations strip away their military capabilities? Isn't that partially why Russia could invade Ukraine? I don't see how this can maintain itself.
Is that not how all these modern problems are happening? Is that now why we are looking towards a future where there are less native men and women in general? My proposition would be that if these are the results we are getting from the answers men and women are giving to their modern predicament, we must be asking the wrong questions.
More options
Context Copy link