This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I hate to break this to you, but when judges order you to pay, they don't give a shit whether you actually have the money or not, and they aren't going to give you guidance on how to get it. You can be flat broke and ordered to pay a million dollars, and the court can do everything from seize bank accounts, foreclose on property, and garnish paychecks until hell freezes over. And government entities don't get some magical exemption from this. But that's all beside the point. He's arguing that he has the right to not spend money appropriated by congress, so maybe use that money? Or maybe just tell the Treasury Department to write a check; he's already got the Supreme Court decision saying he can't be charged with violating any laws that are part of his official duties. However he would have found it, the point is that he didn't spend the money because he didn't want to spend the money. A Democrat would have found a way to get the money. Do you seriously think a Democrat would have made the same excuse?
At what point do I make any predictions? Last year I did and entire post on why I don't make predictions, and why I don't overthink the predictions I do make. That being said, you still have to heed certain warning signs, lest you find yourself whistling past the graveyard, and you still have to capitalize on advantages. I'm not predicting that the Democrats will win in the midterms. I'm saying that Republicans have x, y, and z weaknesses that they need to shore up if they want to have their best chance at winning, and Democrats need to push x,y, and z advantages if they want their best shot at winning. I you don't think that anything I've said is a problem, then fine. I'm some rando on the internet and it's your prerogative to ignore me. But I've made similar criticisms of the Democrats over the past 15 years and was assured by everyone in the bag for them that none of their woke bullshit would ever be a problem.
More options
Context Copy link