site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 30, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Outdoor transmission and whether it's a significant isn't something that anyone knows from first principles.

Fair enough, but with a little bit of updating from what was mainstream news, one could have easily updated his model that covid isn't as potent as chemical weapons, given that very early on we knew that prolonged indoor mass gatherings of people with covid positive people only had a fraction of the people actually catching the virus, rest assured if you dropped a chemical weapon everyone in the building and possibly the neighborhood would be dead/hospitalized. So initially covid is somewhere between as deadly as nothing and {chemical weapon}, Then onwards it would have taken a month or two of updating from just watching the news and observing anecdata to arrive at a reasonable assessment of how deadly covid really is.

No dispute that it's possible for some people to have come to the conclusion that outdoor masking is silly, from multiple lines of evidence.

My point would be that expecting any mass schooling system to create the ability to do this in most of its students is an unrealistic expectation. Broadly diffused critical thinking, scientific intuitions, learning how to learn, etc. can't be the basis for how society makes decisions, because people are really, really bad at those things. Best case scenario is that elite channels have the ability to drive mass behavior, and that the behaviors they drive are in fact good ones.

What's the role for schooling, then? Teaching basic academic skills (reading, arithmetic) necessary for success in life and giving rules of thumb that when followed will lead to good lives, while identifying exceptional students and tracking them to places where they can be most useful.