This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I really don't think this is true of a great deal of American conservatives. The fact that Japan, say, prioritizes the ethnic Japanese does not seem to be a moral problem at all for an awful lot of people, which is why I think online edgelords have latched on to it as a useful argument. America can't really be that kind of country, of course, because of its actual settler+immigrant history means we've always been a mess of different fractious groups from the very beginning, but the fact that other nations have other ways of organizing their borders seems pretty unobjectionable.
From that perspective, though, the problem with Israeli influence is that Jewish people are being very normal about their enthocentrism (which is a default almost everywhere around the globe, and will return to being more apparently as America and the West become relatively weaker compared to everyone else), and current American liberalism rules it entirely out-of-bounds to name it and respond appropriately to it, because saying that groups exist and fight for their own (entirely sensible, but also entirely non-universal) interests, sounds a great deal like what has been defined as antisemitism in this case... To that conservative perspective, someone Jewish being a partisan for Israel and Jewish people is totally normal and sensible, but the fact that the American government refuses to likewise be a partisan for Americans and American people (and the boundary here is certainly complicated) is the actual glaring problem, especially in a case like this where (so the claim goes) these Jewish interests are being especially sharp elbowed as the expense of a lot of Americans.
That's at least something like the kind of perspective I come across, at any rate.
More options
Context Copy link