This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Also disagree, because it's very very hard to separate things out from, you know, the Christian morality that preaches kind of the exact same thing. Where traditionally at least, many personality traits have opposites and one of them is straight up better or superior. Humility instead of pride, gratitude instead of envy, charity instead of greed, industriousness instead of sloth, kindness instead of cruelty, equality instead of inequality, meekness instead of being overbearing, peacemaking instead of violent dissension, being longsuffering instead of quick to anger, etc. Again traditionally, it's not common to see people preach that there's a such thing as being "too humble" or anything like that. The attributes are almost purely positive.
Interestingly to me at least, I really don't think "fairness" belongs here in that Christian virtue list, and to a lesser extent equality is strictly about emphasizing that we are equal in the eyes of God and goes not much further. Although Jesus clearly was all for voluntary charity and equality, as a policy prescription he doesn't offer too much, and it certainly doesn't appear in the Beatitudes or anything like that. Fairness as a concept does not really feature! In fact, the opposite; Christians have good doctrinal reasons to not be too concerned with fairness since it's explicitly proposed that things will be made right in the afterlife, a feature that partially contributed to its adoption in Medieval Europe by many states (it's very handy for those in power when these principles are individually sought but not systemically proposed).
At any rate I disagree with learned helplessness on behalf of the oppressed being necessarily a feature of wokeness, even if they coincide sometimes in practice. MLK is the classic canonical example of an "approved" method of peaceful yet notably strident and forceful resistance on behalf of the oppressed. In that sense "Slave Morality" seems purely pejorative or dismissive rather than truly descriptive.
More options
Context Copy link