This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It's a little difficult to comment with confidence yet, just because there's something like (im)plausible deniability for at least some of the locations, still. Especially near the holidays you'd expect a child care business to be very feast-or-famine, it's not always obvious how closely a given 'business' is tied to a specific number of hours, and a number of violations during an inspection can 'just' point to a small and new business. Even the multitude of businesses with a shared address could mean that the owners are operating out of their homes and have an office park PO box to handle mail -- that's not even particularly unusual for actually-legit service-oriented small businesses.
But there's a lot of stuff that stinks to high heaven. At minimum, compliance had to have completely skipped most of the steps and processes that a normal child care agency had to go through. Even where it's 'real' in the sense that they're doing child care, some of it's probably not real in the sense of paying the claimed fees that justify the various grants and subsidies, and most of it's almost certainly not 'real' in the sense of complying with the long array of standards and regulations.
There's a non-zero chance Shirley ends up facing charges, here, which will be one of the funniest possible endings. ((Of course he's serious, and stop calling him Surely.)) There's a lot of rules about creeps filming kids, with reason.
There's also a >95% chance that there's some org or orgs has been actively farming these businesses or 'businesses' up in exchange for a cut, and is totally within the bounds of the law. Probably has extensive documentation that they cleanly and clearly described each and every regulatory requirement (to people who didn't understand them). The really fun question is how many of them are making political donations. But at best a bunch of particularly shameless small fry might fry; none of the people in the government who should have noticed that Line Went Up will lose their jobs.
More options
Context Copy link