This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
They won't. First of all, this would go against the demonstrated raison d'etre of ICE. Namely, their fascist tacticool LARP. You don't need guns, secret "police," and general military gear to go to a hotel to check the employee directory. The revealed preferences in actions and very real investment is the opposite of unsexy but effective work. Whatever ICE's real purpose is, it has something more to do with blowing millions of taxpayer money on making a spectacle, picking fights with Americans, or making armed citizen resistance against state violence ineffective (note for the confused in the audience, this would be pointless for real immigration enforcement).
Second, if they wanted to do this they would have already. Are their lots of farms and hotels using over the border illegal immigration in Minnesota? No, of course not. The cruelty is the point. The ICE LARP, in part, exists to channel useful idiots away from the real reasons of white demographic replacement with ostentatious displays of cruelty to brown people and symbolic acts against "the Left/Liberals" as a symbol of "something is being done" without obviously doing anything substantive. It exists to do the exact opposite of something substantive and effective.
"The right wing," as much as it is a real thing, exists to simp for and be useful tools to elite capital (and Jews) that benefit from cheap, therefore often third-world from low IQ areas, labor. To actually hurt the pocketbook of capital would go against the very funding base, closest thing it has to an intellectual base (who do you think is doing Heritage?), and purpose defining "the right" has - especially mainstream right. The capital holding elite would sooner perma close the American Republican party and just try to start a new one.
More options
Context Copy link