site banner

Small-Scale Question Sunday for January 25, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Out of curiosity what did they do to the story to make the 2010 show such a meme?

A couple of reasons.

  1. The casting was terrible. The actors themselves are mostly fine but they’re badly miscast. You end up with what feels like a Lu Su playing Liu Bei, a Yuan Shu playing Cao Cao, etc. When the core characters, Cao Cao, Liu Bei, Guan Yu, Zhang Fei, Zhuge Liang are all miscast at the same time, the entire show collapses.

  2. The script writing was very bad. The 1994 version used a classical vernacular script that preserved historical immersion, the 2010 version uses modern vernacular Chinese. On top of that, the dialogue is constantly trying to sound clever, punchy, and “memorable.” You get lines engineered for quotability and trying too hard to sound deep but without gravitas. That left the audiences with too many lines that can be turned into memes when the time is ripe.

  3. It was made during a period obsessed with “reinterpretations” of classics. I don’t know how closely you follow mainland media, but this show came after Yi Zhongtian’s hugely popular reinterpretation of RoTK. He had a very cynical view of the history (not his invention), Liu Bei as hypocritical, Cao Cao as selfish but pragmatically “real” (in his own words 真小人>伪君子), and everyone stripped of moral elevation. That clearly influenced the show’s script writing and acting.

The end result is that no one really respects the show. Compared to the 1994 version, it’s obvious that the newer one completely lacks 形 意 神. Add in the often silly dialogue and awkward acting, and what you get is a meme generator.