This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Firstly, just as a general rule, we should expect crazy people are going to come out of the woodwork and make insane accusations (probably in many cases easily-disprovable) about pretty much any public figure. Some people are crazy and will grab the spotlight any chance they get. The fact that spurious accusations have been made of Epstein does not mean that there's no fire here, necessarily. (It does mean, imho, that we should take the numbers ("1200 victims" or whatever) with a grain of salt.)
Secondly, it should surprise no one if savvy operators arrange for such a scenario to be made, although I've seen no specific evidence of that here. But if there was actually worldwide conspiracy to do illegal stuff, would you not come up with trivially easy ways to undermine any case that could be made against you? Basic misdirection techniques are, well, basic, and I don't think pointing to what could be a pretty trivial misdirect that any competent conspiracy could put together and use it as slam-dunk evidence against a competent conspiracy is actually very persuasive.
The real thrust of my comment here is less about Epstein specifically and more the drum I keep banging on in here, which is how to evaluate how conspiracies (can) work. And while it's not clear to me that Epstein, who seems to have been pretty cavalier in his emails, bothered to take such defensive measures I think anyone who is contemplating the possibility of a competent conspiracy ought to at least consider that such things might exist.
More options
Context Copy link