This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The big ones in recent memory that I see are the reduced credibility of most mainstream journalism outlets due to their obviously and blatantly tribal behavior with respect to Trump starting over a decade ago, and also the 2024 election, where I believe plenty of marginal Democrats and would-be Democrats seemed to tear away from the party due in part to the blatant tribal hypocrisy in that same period of time. I don't know, but I heavily doubt that it's uniformly applied. If you were to argue that, I would respond that, based on your writing, you likely have very good, very strong reasons for believing that, and unfortunately there's no real way to adjudicate which one of us is correct.
I think it lowered the rate at which white people (and white-tolerant people) were won over by the ideology in question, especially among young people who were just awakening politically and just gaining the right to vote.
That's not my perception. Principled moderates didn't put it back in the box, and principled moderates largely can't (I think, most likely, no one can, just like no one can put things like Nazism or Communism (by many people's lights, wokeness is the latest iteration of this) "back in the box" - they'll always be with us, and that's why we'll always need to keep developing new antibodies against them, because god knows that they aren't stopping their continual evolution). What I think happened is that people who actually do care about principles got turned off from the Democratic party, and due to how the 2 parties are, at a baseline, around 50/50, there didn't need much of a shift to change the election results, which had downstream effects with respect to Common Knowledge about how much other people liked wokeness. Which was never popular organically, but rather popular like Kim Jong Un is in North Korea.
And, indeed, it ain't dead. It's not even hibernating. It's going just as hard in full force, in the many little and large fiefdoms that it still owns. Again, I doubt it's possible to kill it, and I don't even have much of an idea on how to reduce it further.
I mean, to whatever extent that the Red Tribe wants to crush wokeness, I'll root for them and even help them along, in the same way that I would root for a surgeon to cut out a malignant tumor. But I'm not sure what sort of "moderation" you're talking about that would be the right-wing equivalent of a blue-haired leftist deciding that progressive leftist critical race theory/third-wave-feminist-informed principles find it perfectly okay that white people feel okay being white.
More options
Context Copy link