This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It was. The state was compelling others to refer to them with a specific designation and suppressing all other ones.
A state shouldn't compel anyone's speech, so no to the latter. To the former, it's not practical to stop someone from saying nigger and a state should not even try. I advise people against saying nigger in polite company due to the obvious social consequences, but people do have the right to say it.
It wouldn't be as inalienable as you think. It would just be like guns, which supposedly are a right but in practice function more like a privilege than driving is. I can imagine a world where you don't need a license but you still need to be old enough, follow safety laws, etc. and can be prohibited from operating a vehicle if necessary, just like how states have regulations on riding a bicycle but don't mandate licensing, registration, or insurance.
Should MAGA avoid reading sources like AP News, which routinely promotes the plights of trans people, so they don't have to think about them? I'm confused by this tendency to argue that trans people don't matter to your life and why are you even thinking about them in the first place, you're just obsessed -- and then in the next breath crow on about how trans people are oppressed and their suffering is so important that they are to be prioritized above the price of eggs. You can't have it both ways. If it's worth your time to make trans people the centerpiece of discussion, then it's worth my time to give my opinion on them.
A lot of people have children and are concerned (rightly or wrongly) about trans people grooming their kids. MAGA has issues but I don't think being anti-trans is one of them.
More options
Context Copy link