Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 68
- 0
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If a discovery is finding something that you, or the people around you, didn't know about at then telling them about it, then an invention is finding a way to make something or do something, while a non-invention discovery is finding something that already existed. You discover a new plant or a ruin, you invent a lightbulb or a martial art or a programming language. The theoretical concept of how to do these things can be imagined to have existed somewhere in imagination land, but if no human being actually has this knowledge then the knowledge itself literally did not exist until you caused it to exist by putting into people's minds. And in the case of physical inventions like a lightbulb the actual thing itself also did not exist until you created one. If you had chosen to change the methods of your creation, the features of it would change. In some sense this is inventing a different thing rather than the original thing, but in many cases it's minor tweaks that don't fundamentally change its nature but are superficial (you might add a different number of coils to your lightbulb design, or you might put the steps in your mathematical proof in a slightly different order).
Meanwhile, before you discover a new plant that plant is still on the Earth doing its thing. You unambiguously did not invent the plant, it was already there before you arrived. You can't tweak the plant's discovery in minor ways to alter what it looks like (or at least, any tweaking is something you do afterwards and is not a part of the discovery process). It was already there, and you did not cause it to manifest in the real world in the way you do with an invention.
More options
Context Copy link