site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 30, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

b) the (usually correct) fear that any men's movement or space will rapidly become anti-woman.

There was a story not too long ago about Men's Sheds, an organization for men to get together to combat social isolation. These were not young incels. These were not redpillers. Many were married older men.

If any institution wouldn't need to be feminized in order to avoid sexism, you'd think it'd be this. And yet...

I think it's just zero sum thinking on the part of ideologues + an obvious realization among others that society makes it easier for people to force entry into someone else's organization rather than being forced to do their own thing. The Men in Sheds women were not really nefarious or trying to maintain their gender's power, they just wanted to spend time with their husbands. Once upon a time, it'd just be accepted that men can have a little corner to themselves. Now it's more dubious (since we know men and women aren't really that different), so some people push in.

I don't think that trans-identifying males barging into woman's spaces is because of a real sense that women would be otherwise sexist (though that sort of neuroticism can be encouraged as a pretext). Society has simply corrected for past sins by moving towards a suspicion of allowing groups to determine their own affairs if it cuts against certain protected characteristics. If Ibram Kendi is right about anything, it's that these legal norms then spread out to the rest of society.