This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I wasn't attacking you. I was disagreeing with you.
Whether I'm properly a rationalist or not, I am at least rat adjacent. I've read the Sequences, kept up with Scott Alexander, and I believe that IQ is largely genetic and not everyone is born with the same endowment of it. I wasn't saying "boo IQ" or "boo smartness" or anything of the sort.
I was saying what I thought to be the case: that you might have lived most of your life in a bubble. I was saying this because I believe on some level I have lived in such a bubble. I was a gifted and talented kid, took honors and AP classes, and my parents both worked in a STEM field. I know that I internalized the idea that intelligence was very important, if not the most important thing. But I try not to be an elitist or a misanthrope. At a very basic level, I like people, and there are plenty of virtues I value besides intelligence such as kindness, civic virtue, or industriousness.
I'm not offended or surprised at the idea that some people might have lower natural endowments of intelligence. I don't view discussing it as the same thing as discussing whether some people are sub-human or not. I just thought you might be living in a bubble of sorts, without any judgement. If I'm wrong, I apologize for my incorrect assessment of your situation.
More options
Context Copy link