site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 30, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's 6 months before the mid-terms and polls imply a blue wave.

Not that this makes it better for Trump, but the opposition doing very well in midterm elections (and in state elections) is very normal for US politics. E.g., the Obama administration got smacked so hard over the course of his presidency that when he left office, though still personally quite popular, the Democratic party was in a worse place nationally than it had been since 1920.

With the way things are trending, it would take a great fumble for Dems to lose the house. Trump may also lose sufficient seats in Senate, so that 2028 could shape up to be a trifecta win for a Democrat.

I'm not sure the bolded part follows. Yes, recently there's been a trend against presidents being able to hand off the office to their successor, but as you point out, that's also heavily-dependent upon candidate quality. For example, it's far from clear whether Trump would have been able to beat Joe Biden in 2016, had he decided to run. HRC was a uniquely polarizing candidate who also was personally bad at retail politics and took bad campaign strategy advice, and Trump only just squeaked out a victory over her in the first place. If the Dems nominate Newsome some other cypher, they may dig themselves the same hole this time as well.

Additionally, whatever happens in 2028, there will be major changes to the electoral map in 2030, with major blue states losing significant population share and thus electoral votes to red states, and possibly even changes like striking down of Section 2 of the VRA act, which as currently read compels the gerrymandering of Dem-locked "majority minority" districts across the otherwise solid-red deep south.