This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If you look at a lot of historical feminists, especially the ones further out from the overton window of the time, you often see them abused either by a male partner or a relative. If more women feel maltreated either by male family members or by the romantic/sexual partners, then I think that would drive them to more radical pro-woman identity politics. Given the correlation of divorce and sexual abuse as well as the numerous points women make about the, generally sub-abuse but often criminal, harms they suffer in hookup culture I can very well see a case where women now have more meaningful negative experiences with men than they did in the past.
Writing this, I think it's also important to note that women aren't a monolith and, generally mediated by class, they will have different experiences with men. Underclass women have always had a horrible time almost by definition. I suspect a difference now is that working class on up to even PMC women have a lot more negative experiences with men than in the past, especially if you look at sub-criminal stuff like many hookup culture complaints. If women's collective experience with men is worse than it was in the past, it makes sense they would be more pro-female anti-male.
All this being said, it's a question of margins. I'm Gen Z, and my wife and I voted Trump. There is always a diversity of views and experiences.
How can it be so worse? Practically every law and societal norm has been adjusted in the last 100 years in their favor. You could argue that the sexual revolution was a trap, but that was half a century ago. Or you could argue that most everything is a trap, not because it's a patriarchal conspiracy, but due to second-order effects no one could've foreseen or used as a justification, like suffrage leading to political polarization and normalizing equal pay leading to single-income families becoming unable to maintain the same standard of living.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link