site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 13, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In social justice progressivism, it is racist to claim that a non-white person is racist or sexist. (It might be ok to express discomfort with the Taliban's treatment of women as long as you amend it with a claim that the GOP is at least as bad.)

Basically, racism/sexism is a cultural thing and to disapprove of aspects of non-white cultures is racist.

There is probably a scissor statement for SJP when you pick a minority somewhere in the middle of the totem pole of oppressedness. Like 'Is it racist if a Romani prefers his daughter to marry a Romani man to marrying a man from Ghana?' SJW1 might round 'Romani' to 'white' and decide that it is racist, while SJW2 might round it to 'oppressed minority' and decide that saying that SJW1 is committing cultural genocide.

In my mind, there is likely something which is terrible about any culture. These are terrible to women, those have a caste system with little intermixing, these cut off parts of kids genitals, those are gerontocratic, these have a culture heavy on organized murder, those are mostly zealots, etc.

With regard to the WaPo article, what strikes me as particular cringe is the tagline of Bezos' newspaper -- "Democracy dies in darkness". The WaPo as a light in the MAGA darkness (which is how I read the claim) would be more believable if Amazon had not just spend 40M$ on Melania.