This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Broadly the person the state puts the interests of above all else is the child in any given relationship. Generally, a culture of distrust towards women that would mandate (or heavily incentive) paternity tests is far more liable to result in arguments and general suspicion, even in otherwise harmonious relationships once the issue is raised as it necessarily implies a fear on the husband’s behalf on the trustworthiness and fidelity of his wife. Beyond that, the ideal circumstance to raise a child is (according to most sources) within a family home with at least two parents. The child as such would benefit the most from being raised within such a home, even if in reality the child is actually not biologically related to one of its guardians.
The biological connection can be observed to not be too significant of a factor broadly speaking in the raising of a child, as we already have many instances of for instance adopted children, or children born via sperm donation or surrogacy being able to grow up well adjusted and with healthy connections to her (legal) parents. Besides, the fear you describe has already been shown to be a largely hypothetical problem, since in France for instance paternity tests are broadly discouraged and effectively illegal, and all the same healthy relationships resulting in families still occur.
The opposite: once the husband asks for a paternity test, there's already an argument and suspicion, and the only way it would be resolved is if the test confirms they're the father.
I agree that the father should stay. But I argue that forcing him to pay child support is actually counterproductive here.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link