site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 4, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean, prove me wrong, but to my eyes, Angelus Novus's defense is what it says, but what it says isn't in the actual artwork.

One of my earliest memories is of walking through an airport, and seeing the cover art of a book: one of the volumes of Mike Mignola's Ffafhard and the Grey Mouser. Cliches for the experience abound; I would say Amagari-Fault-style "this hole was made for me" comes close. It was the first time I experienced art as art, and the impression was indelible. It was several years later when I found a couple volumes of Hellboy in a book store, and devoured them, and couldn't get over the artwork. Mignola's my favorite artist, always has been and always will be.

Angelus Novus (and Klee's other work) is a huge part of where Mignola's art came from. The influence is obvious and unmistakable in how the lines work. The dick-fingers and dick-toes and Dungeon-Soup-Barbarian facial expression are obstacles, but there is significant power in the lines themselves, power that I could personally describe in objective terms at some length. Klee is not my favorite artist and never will be, but I will argue that he's not an example of an artist who only exists in the artist's statement.

Huh. That's a little frustrating because I can spell out, if not necessarily in complex or deep or particularly informed, how Mignola's art works at fundamental Technical and Arc points, in ways I can't gather from Klee's; I can show how several other artists, especially in the comic world, either descended from Mignola or evolved in parallel, in ways that I can't from Klee's work, or even (what seems to me like) Klee's better work.

But that may be, and may probably be, a limitation in myself. I don't have the abilities even basic artists develop breaking the composition into its underlying shapes and motions of lines.

I guess I'd have to ask whether that power is relevant because Klee achieved it in his works, or because he influenced it such that others could fulfill it later?