This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It should be quite obvious that this is the case too…
Our universe is 99.99999% composed of a lethal, radiation-filled vacuum (inhospitable to life), and said percentage of all the material in the universe comprises stars and black holes on which no life of any kind can live, and the same percent of all other material in the universe (planets, moons, clouds, asteroids, etc.) is barren of life. Even what extremely tiny and inconsequential bits of it are at all hospitable are extremely inefficient at producing life at all and in any form, but far more so intelligent life. If the knife edge proves it’s a designer then it’s a pretty dumb ass designer.
If God existed, then we’d have pretty much something like what Aristotle or the Bible imagined; a fully inhabited cosmos, top to bottom, no larger or older than it needed to be, everything in existence and working together right out of the gate, from the very beginning. Genesis would have been confirmed to be literally true by now. Space would be a breathable, habitable area, that’s empty of radiation and other dangerous things. People would already live there, as they will have done, like us down here, since the first instant of creation. The world would work exactly as needed simply by God’s will alone. There’d be no need of gravity. Things would just fall where he wanted. There would be no complex nuclear physics. Substances would just have the properties he wanted. There would be no electromagnetism. Light would just shine where He wanted, matter would just form as He wanted, and if He still wanted magnets, he’d just will them into existence and to work as he pleased. That would be a theologically driven cosmology.
More options
Context Copy link