site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1d ago (text post)   4454 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 25, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think they definitely need to be a part of whatever FIRST goes with. Even if not!FLL wanted to keep the Lego relationship going, the possibility Lego might just stop selling to them (or worse, sell and then delay a shipment at the last moment) because they're direct competitors is a Sword of Damocles for the entire ecosystem. And the clone vendors are just way too attractive to ignore, since in many cases it's cheaper to buy from them than to get raw plastic feedstock.

The trouble's the practical side of that:

  • You need someone who can actually negotiate that purchase and sales infrastructure at scale, with guarantees that it will last. That's hard to do because any contract to someone who only exists as a corporate entity overseas isn't worth the paper it's written on, but it can be done well enough. I just don't think FIRST has anyone who can do that. It'd be a major project just to figure out how to handle the kit bundling and sales.
  • You need compliance. A sizable portion of these kits are going to schools that simply won't buy your products without the right paperwork, but even direct sales might make their insurers pucker without it. For the US, that means CPSIA testing, ATSM F963, and (for electronics) FCC Part 15 testing. All I know for EU/AU/whatever is that they're more additional costs. Individually, these aren't tremendously expensive compared to the pure development side, but there's a lot of them, they add up, and they're very vulnerable to supplier changes. Almost no Chinese manufacturer does this stuff, and any that pretend should be treated as suspect. (I have no idea how dropshippers or aiislove handles this, outside of probably 'not': enforcement is extremely rare unless there's a serious incident, so a lot of small businesses can get away with 100-scale or 1000-scale sales, but that won't let FIRST do it for 30k units).
  • You need a real electronics solution. There's a mountain of Chinese vendors here, but it's overwhelmingly targeting the hobbyist sector (or, less charitably, 'cheap crap' sector). The world of 'good programming environments, well-hardened enclosure, focused on 6-14 year-old market, discrete motor hardware' is a lot smaller. The set that does that and can pass compliance and make 30k kits a year for ten years is basically zero: either they're building controller boards that change with whatever silicon is trendy, they have an RoHS status of 'trust me bro', or they're intended to compete with Vex IQ rather Technic, or some combination of the above. You could build a relationship with someone that's making it something for you seriously... but I don't know that FIRST can.
  • You need a sales avenue that isn't crazy. The average FLL lead mentor is not going to buy from Alibaba. The average school team can't buy from Alibaba. Traditionally FIRST has relied on AndyMark and Rev Robotics (and to a lesser extent, CTRE) to do that, and none of them can handle this sort of process and production run.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats