This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
VCDL has filed the motion to rule to show cause for violation of the court order. The evidence is damning, complete, and undeniable. The VSP implementation can't even depend on the new statute, because it hasn't gone into effect yet and can't constitutionally go into effect until July 1st. Though the state's politicians and stenographers are going to pretend it does anyway, since they didn't amendment out the "emergency status" text of the statute that they didn't get the votes to support.
It also doesn't matter.
VCDL's pleading is open-ended enough that it could be asking that Jeffery Katz and Jay Jones face criminal contempt, and the judge could theoretically pass such a recommendation to the local prosecutors or appoint a new one -- and it's not going to happen, full stop, period, it's like shouting about 18 USC 242 or promoting citizen grand juries where even talking about it just marks you as a crank. There's just a
Optimistically, the best-case scenario for VCDL is a declaration that the injunction wasn't dissolved yet, and that Virginia owes them reasonable fees. Aka, the state gets to enforce a law illegally for a few days or weeks, the taxpayer pays a trivial fee, and VCDL only loses time but not money. Maybe the Virginia State Police even comply, rather than just thumbing their noses and pretending a minor tweak or disclaimer and doing the same thing anyway is enough? Not like it'll cost them anything if they don't. And it's just a plausible that the court (or appeals, because sanctions and contempt findings are appealable orders) finds that the injunction was going to be dissolved eventually, and that the value of the intervening weeks is zero.
More options
Context Copy link