Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 174
- 1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I’ve met high status and accomplished women who forego a relationship and family life due to their professional commitments or sense of a greater vision for something they’re passionate about. I don’t see that as a problem at all. It’s the ones who think they ‘can’ [and subsequently fail] to accomplish both that often become spinsters. These lifestyles are fine insofar as the costs get born by the women who make them. Where it becomes unacceptable is when the costs are paid (and generally wasted) by society via tax money.
In the past, men were responsible for providing for their wife and children (as they should be). They produce the surplus to support them and in return the woman provides household services and children for their husbands. Today that dynamic has now become a parasitic one, because women depend on the coercive power of the government to strong arm and extract wealth from men while providing them with nothing in return (child support and alimony testify to these examples); and it’s all to uphold a system of false “equality” that’s built entirely off massive wealth transfers. One result of this incidentally has meant that working age men have substantially less wealth to afford forming families of their own.
More options
Context Copy link