This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Moving my response here. I don't think it makes you Leftist Shill, exactly, more like Usefully Naive Centrist.
Public figures calling for calm have burned all their credibility over and over, and to keep giving them the benefit of the doubt is Einstein's supposed definition of insanity.
Surely we can accept by now that in fact no, they're pretty specific about when they call for that and exactly how they put it down, and how they pressure victim's families into making hostage statements? None of them called for calm when they were promoting BLM riots, as far too many Europeans and their politicians did!
While #notallimmigrants is true, why would anyone believe that it's more than mealymouthed slop when it's coming from the cultureless, soulless cretins that promote pure propaganda like Adolescence? It's not like this is a one-off, or a tenth-off. It's just the Norm Macdonald tweet, over and over.
Is there any evidence that it's not? At some point, they have to do something, ANYTHING, to credibly display that they care more about actual violent crime than about "community relations."
It's hard to make that balance clear when everyone's lying eyes tell them that the ruling class of the UK would rather let low-class girls be raped in perpetuity and a growing number of random civilians be stabbed to death, than to be called racist. Hell, the police would rather let a man bleed to death in the street than help him because he was accused of racism! People like Starmer would, seemingly, rather start slitting throats themselves than restrict immigration at all or change any policy.
More options
Context Copy link