This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well, I for my part blink a lot! If we just blindly look at everything that was a given in the ancestral environment, we find
some things like sunlight that people still seem to struggle if bereft of
some other things like eating meat and a highly diverse diet of foraged plants, doing without which seems to be basically fine for most everyone
some things like walking barefoot that are only advocated by weird people with benefits that are probably minimal, if at all existent
some things like having high parasite load all your life where the upsides of not doing it clearly far outweigh whatever downsides (higher propensity for allergies?)
some things like chimpanzee-style violent tribal conflict that we have decided we don't want and seem to be happier off without on an intellectual level, but that sometimes reassert themselves in strange ways.
How do we know which of these classes breeding is in? To begin with, apart from some very indirect methods like genetic drift estimation on gonosomes, what can we even infer about the exact type of "breeding" that we were optimised for? There are a lot of wobbly bridges being crossed here from what we actually know to the "it is imperative that all young men be given an opportunity to breed" conclusion.
More options
Context Copy link