site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 13, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This has the same "Republicans pounce!" energy as those people arguing "the only reason people are aware of trans is because of anti-trans people talking about it!"

AIDS might have been treated as more worthy of public attention, rather that being initially ignored as only affecting people they thought didn't matter;

I read an article recently arguing that this claim is essentially a myth invented by LGBT activists, must see if I can dig it out.

the public health advice might have been less "Stop being gay" and more "Either form exclusive relationships like straight couples do, or if you insist on having coitus with strangers, use a condom";

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the argument from cultural evolution. Joseph Henrich et al. argue that cultures which survive will be those that develop memes optimised for survival. The cultures may have explanatory hypotheses for why these memes are effective, those hypotheses may be dead wrong, and yet the memes themselves still work. Cultures organically converged on the idea that gay sex is dangerous centuries prior to the discovery of germ theory or the invention of reliable latex condoms. Their explanations for why gay sex is a bad idea may have been in error, but "gay sex is bad because Allah does not will it" and "gay sex is bad because you will catch a disease which will kill you in a matter of years" both suggest the same course of action: don't have gay sex.

Gay men in the 1970s might well have asked "well, why shouldn't I have unprotected sex with dozens of men who are all doing the same thing?" Most likely their family and friends wouldn't have been able to articulate a specific casual mechanism by which this was a bad idea. That doesn't mean their family and friends were wrong about it being a bad idea.