This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Different states have different laws. If only there was some entity with the power to regulate interstate commerce, this would all be so much simpler.
Personally, I think it is (mostly) reasonable to expect people to follow the laws of the state they are in. Nor do I have a problem with having them stand trial for something which is criminalized by both states if they commit a crime remotely: if you send a mail bomb to a different state, shipping you to that state for your trial seems fair enough.
If your state (and federal laws) did allow you to ship weed over state lines, then it should not have to worry about how the state of the recipient -- or any states on the package's route, for that matter -- might feel about it. Likewise with shipping or serving porn. If Utah does not want porn to move through their fibers, that should between them and any telcos who own fibers in Utah, not people running servers.
On the other hand, as a member of the rest of the world over whom the US would totally claim jurisdiction I see some poetry in the equality in injustice between an European who has to keep US laws and a Pennsylvanian who has to keep NJ laws.
That only makes sense if our founding document and basis of all law and government had a clause that forbid the government from infringing on mail bombs.
They shouldn't be able to do this at all, in any way. It is forbidden from the federal government, and, due to 14th amendment jurisprudence, from the states as well. Any comparison with guns needs to make that fact apparent and it needs to have some comparison, too.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link