This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There seems to be a rhetorical trick being employed by safety proponents where "being in support of open models" means "sharing, in some small part, responsibility for when open models end up causing damage" when in reality this is a total non-sequitur.
As a first matter of practicality, unless you are a high-ranking member of the CCP, there is approximately nothing you can do to prevent proliferation of open models if it's deemed in the interest of the Chinese state that it happens; Pakistan and North Korea got the bomb, and the world got Kimi K3, despite American seething to the contrary. Banning Chinese models from being hosted on American soil or sanctioning the Chinese model developers is simply pretending that this isn't going to happen, and entrenching the market position of the existing closed-weight providers, rather than achieving anything meaningful.
As a second matter of practicality, from what we can tell the majority of actual black-hat activity eventuated via LLM has happened via jail-breaking of closed-weight models rather than the use of the feared abliterated open-weight models e.g this Claude hack of Mexico. If you're a black hat with ~infinite access via black market token proxies and don't fear legal consequences, you can already just put effort into jailbreaking the frontier models and using them for evil, while legitimate white hats are the ones that have to use Chinese models because they fear reputational and legal consequences. This is a fully intractable problem unless you go actually closed-weights i.e no access other than by via white-list.
If we already live in a fragile world, then so be it; attempting to restrict open weights is not going to make it any less fragile. It's better to do what we can to harden the world via proliferation rather than sticking our heads in the sand, hoping that will reverse the changes happening in the world.
More options
Context Copy link