This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This portends an interesting future where essayists, novelists, poets, and other professional writers intentionally make an LLM generate recognizable LLM-isms as a way to spruce up their writings, like how a rock guitarist might intentionally hold up his guitar to the speaker to generate feedback as an intentional part of the music they're making. Imagine an entire genre of writing where it's not surprising for the writer to paste in LLM generations without notifying the reader, but intentionally produced to appear overtly LLM-generated, communicating to the reader that it's LLM-generated without explicitly saying as such, in order for the reader to enjoy the text for its obviously LLM-generated qualities that the author intentionally wanted to add to his writing, like how, again, feedback is used in some musical performances.
That's the point.
We saw an early version of this in that short lived trend of AI generated images that are structurally identical to another, well known image, but only structurally such that someone who doesn't know the reference could not decode it.
We'll yet see the same for LLMs I'm sure. The great novel of this century has surely to reckon with the biggest change to writing since the invention of the personal computer.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link