This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I like this point, but I think it has more to do with the latency of communication. The immediacy of the chat interface is the issue, not communication itself; the immediacy creates a stronger sense of intimacy and interactivity. It should be more like email: you email the LLM a task or question, and some period of time later (probably on the order of 30 min or so is enough to break the psychological offloading aspect) you get whatever artifacts it produced, and it encourages you to think about and digest what the LLM generated before moving on to the next thing. Maybe, if the LLM has clarifying questions etc, it could respond back in 5 minutes instead.
I do think this could help with this angle, but a slower response is probably not as important as one that does not seem like a person on the internet.
More options
Context Copy link
I like this idea from a cognitive psychology perspective, but I fear it introduces a number of serious usability challenges. If I'm, say, coding and am using an LLM to help me debug, waiting 30 minutes for assistance would obliterate any chance of entering a flow state within the work. Perhaps there could be multiple product lines - one optimized for short-term responses and another that follows a high-latency "correspondence" model - but the task of positioning them in the market and adequately advertising it strikes me as extremely difficult. I just don't think there is a significant appetite for high-friction technology, and this is coming from someone who has tried to switch to a flip phone repeatedly.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link