This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is an interesting point; not sure I agree with it.
A while back I read a post elsewhere (somewhere with dramatically lower average post quality) suggesting laying razor wire along the border. Another poster decried that proposal as evil. Razor wire inflicts terrible injuries; does merely attempting to cross the border justify such horrific punishment? ... But razor wire isn't invisible. I don't even think it's plausible that anyone, however stupid or poorly educated, could fail to understand what running into razor wire would do, given a chance to inspect it. (Animals, on the other hand, might be that stupid; not saying this is a good idea.) Realistically, how many potential migrants would actually injure themselves on the wire? A few, maybe, doing a poor job cutting their way through. Approximately zero just charging into it. What if instead it were just a wall? Would that proposal be similarly evil due to the head trauma potential migrants might experience if they chose to ram into it head first? Surely even that poster wouldn't have the temerity to suggest as much.
But at the same time, I do agree people can be stupid and stubborn, especially if only a small number need to for disastrous consequences to follow. I think the relevant distinction might be whether there's another person in the loop? Charging a machine gun nest might feel like a better bet than charging razor wire, because the gunner might decide not to fire for any number of reasons but the wire can't decide anything. And social reasoning is comparatively, so even if the gunner is in fact very likely to fire, maybe it's more likely for stubborn/stupid people to make the wrong call?
More options
Context Copy link