site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2d ago (text post)   1618 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for October 9, 2026

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's been some similar drama with Star Citizen. It's an aethestically and conceptually fascinating game, limited heavily by the combination of a) bizarrely poor development priorities, b) incredible bloat in development goals, and c) a financial model that's become dependent on selling ships to whales, d) with corresponding impact on game balance.

The same people who can't get mission selection working reliably are, unsurprisingly, not great at handling game. So now there's 'mods' that allow an offline mode that gets past the notoriously buggy physics sync problems (just fixed literally two days ago), allows spawning in of resources and characters where they wouldn't normally exist, and has been modded with things like a Star Wars Star Destroyer. And CIG has issued takedown notices, with the corresponding totally predictable Streishand effect. This is particularly sticky because the original Kickstarter promoted private servers and modded play, only for those to be removed from the road map and eventually disavowed.

In practice, the shared persistent universe is enough of the call for this game that it's not going to have too many people jump ship. But there's reason CIG is treating it like a nuclear option: even minor improvements to the small team multiplayer environment or to casual gameplay, or for PvE-only worlds, would be something the actual game as presented just can't do, at least from past practice.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats