This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
For the record, the US is still supporting Europe and Ukraine in a big way. The only difference is that Trump's rhetoric makes it appear that support is no longer unconditional.
On the other hand, Europe has nothing but hate and contempt for the US. It's not great.
This implies that Trump is proposing a kind of deal. "I will help you like this if you help me like that". With the follow through of actually committing to help the ones that agree to his terms. Instead what we are seeing is a series of seemingly impulsive decisions and demands. Crucially, Trump does not credibly state what the consequences of breaking his demands will be, nor what it will take to reliably secure his support long term. Instead, his opinions change on a monthly basis and he seems to improvise based on what he considers an appropriate response in the moment.
"I will back out of NATO if you don't increase your spending to 5% GDP" is a statement that support is not unconditional. "Stop fighting" with no reward for doing so, and no sign that Russia will stop its aggression is not. Rate limiting Starlink out of the blue with no prior warning and dropping sanctions on Russia is not a negotiation tactic. At best, it simply shows impulsive and unreliable decision making with zero room for negotiations. At worst it is a sign that America is considering a friendly relationship with Russia while leaving Europe out in the cold.
Is the rate limiting Starlink real? This one pattern matches my hoax detector.
It is reported by Ukrainian, American, and European sources. Notably, neither Elon Musk or the American administration is denying this has happened. What they are saying is that it was not a deliberate decision to reduce aid, but rather due to some other cause. Zelensky and western Europe believe this is a lie though, and that the rate limiting is clearly punitive.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link