This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think the issue is that male sexual fantasies and power fantasies usually get bundled together.
There's no power fantasy in the flipped version of Twilight so it comes across as self indulgent even for fantasy. Unless you count Bella smelling so goshdarned good vampires want to eat her (I don't) or her inability to be impacted by magic (I guess)
The male version would be closer to Wanted with some tweaks. You get good at something (perhaps due to an unearned genetic legacy) and after a lot of blood and pain,preferably other men's, you get to kiss Angelina Jolie in front of your cheating ex. Because those are the sorts of men who do that.
(Wanted itself is partly a subversion - Angelina Jolie isn't suddenly into some random schlub, there's actually a believable plot reason for that to happen - but the skeleton is there)
The second half of Breaking Dawn is a sudden power fantasy, where Bella turns into a vampire and instead of the clumsy damsel-in-distress becomes strong, badass and good at everything, and her anti-magic grows from a curiosity into an awesome power that ends up saving the day by neutralizing the Volturi trump cards.
More options
Context Copy link
I’d say that what saves the Twilight-style of fantasy (“powerful people are fighting over little ol’ me, my goodness”) from being purely fluffy and self-indulgent is that an internal psychological conflict replaces the external conflict for mastery and power. That internal psychological conflict could be anything ranging from a simple fear of literal physical danger, to more abstract concerns about how one relates to one’s own agency, one’s own sense of dignity, etc. There’s usually a “hitch” somewhere, some sort of internal tension between acceptance and reticence. So the two types of fantasies are actually more structurally analogous than they appear. It’s just that in the Twilight-style fantasy, the struggle is harder to see (for an external observer) because a lot of it happens in the MC’s internal monologue.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link