site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 10, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

14
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They obviously wanted to be seen as an attractive young woman – shouldn’t I treat them like one?

Should people be treated as what they'd like to be seen as rather than what they are? Setting aside whether trans women are women, someone that has recently transitioned and isn't even in the ballpark of passing as a woman, much less an attractive one, should not have a reasonable expectation that people will immediately begin pretending that they're attractive as women. Someone that looks like Chris will only be attractive to a specific sort of fetishist, not to a straight male with normal tastes in women.

I can't imagine applying this level of reality distortion field to any other expressed preference. It's trite to bring up examples like, "well, what if someone wanted to be treated as Napoleon?", but that really is the level of dissonance that I experience when a pretty obvious guy in a wig wants to be treated as an attractive woman. Regardless of what their internal experience is, that simply isn't what my eyes see and I don't buy that it's what anyone else is seeing either.

I think it’s good to make some accommodation for others’ worldviews. To gently prod at another preference, consider others’ religion/lack thereof. All but your own will seem laughably absurd. Yet if I was invited to dinner by devout Zoroastrians, I wouldn’t laugh in their faces when they suggested we say a prayer before dinner, nor would I immediately start attacking the holes in their holy book. When a belief seems delusional to you, but is important to someone else, then provided it isn’t causing any real harm, I think you can make accommodations. It’s pretty well impossible to have relationships with people otherwise.

On the other hand, maybe this kind of thinking has landed us in our current predicament? If we were all completely open about calling out what we see as insane, then maybe silly belief structures would find it harder to take root. It’d probably be a society with far more hatred and conflict, though, so I don’t know if the tradeoff is worth it.

There are gradations too, with acting around trans women. It’s one thing to accommodate saying ‘she’ and ‘her’, another to point-blank lie when asked “do you think I’m attractive,” and another entirely to agree to join them in the bedroom so as to maintain the fiction.

All up, provided a transwoman isn’t obnoxious about the whole thing, I feel it’s needlessly demeaning and rude not to do the bare minimum along with it. At the same time, there are limits to what I’ll do.

I think the core conflict here is at what level does self-perception trump others' observed reality?

If someone fancies themselves a genius but struggles with simple maths and spelling, we do not humour them. Their identity as a genius is not to be respected. Other people's labels trump your own. So too with attractiveness. Some professions even have titles that are legally protected in some places -- calling yourself an engineer or a doctor when you aren't one can actually get you in trouble.

It seems to me that the trans issue is almost the only one where self-perception is expected to trump others' observations of you. You can't declare yourself cool, or force a nickname for yourself, or anything like that. But you can declare yourself a woman? I don't buy it. And I don't think trans do either, given their constant insistence on everyone else "validating" them. They know that identities are not really determined by the individual, hence the attempt to force others to perceive them they way they wish to be perceived.