This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Would you say the same about panto? Now of course there are probably individual drag artists who do inject an odd level of quasi-sexualisation into their act, but I don't think that is inherent to drag. Drag definitely can be family-friendly, because otherwise most British parents are apparently unwittingly exposing their children to 'groomer-adjacent' behaviour.
Drag queens typically perform in 18+ establishments, as a rule.
Moreover, pantomime dames don't actually dress like that outside of the theatre for any reason that I'm aware of. Once he's done for the night, Jim takes the wig off and doesn't think about it until the next performance. He certainly doesn't make a separate social media profile for his dame alter-ego, nor list it on his other social medias. It's entirely contained within that one specific context... and nobody had a problem with drag while it was confined to its specific context, either.
Pantomime dames are performing the role of a type of desexualised older woman (often, but not always, the hero or heroine's mother) and wear "ugly" makeup and padding everywhere, not just the chest. The borderline-inappropriately-sexualised character in panto is the hero, who is played by an attractive young woman in skin-tight trousers (leather if there is the slightest excuse).
Drag queens are performing a caricature of female sexuality - in that the character they are playing is supposed to be attractive to hetrosexual men (in some traditions of drag performance the actor in character also is, and in others she isn't).
If someone launched "pantomime dame story hour" in the UK, nobody would complain.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link