This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is your 3rd comment and you have yet to say anything that is clearly related to the thread topic. There is no market in roads, which are all built by the government. That roads allow some people to live further out (at the cost of preventing other people from living closer in) does not change this fact.
The roads are the marketplace, which facilitate direct utility trading. It's like the government expanding a market place allowing more people to buy food. The goal of building a road shouldn't be to reduce congestion its to allow more people to pay the congestion price to get the home they value more than the time they pay.
Similar to building a larger market or a second market may not reduce the price of wheat or bread the purpose of the expansion was to it increases the volume of wheat or bread sold in the market.
This is a very bizarre way of making your point.
Whether or not you personally think reducing congestion is a good goal, it is a commonly stated goal. I've already addressed the "people sitting in traffic is fine because you can eventually get places" elsewhere.
No it's more the price is set by the people willing to pay it. You may not like it, and that's fine, there are lots of prices that I think are ludicrous, too. But as long as people are willing to pay it, I'm in favor of giving more people the opportunity to pay it. Just like I think Beats are a huge waste of money but I'm fine with retailers building more stores where the prices for beats will be the same as their existing full stores.
None of this makes any sense. What price? Most roads aren't toll roads. You mean how long they're willing to wait? Not very meaningful without any alternatives.
Yes, how long they wait is the cost. There are tons of alternatives, because people choose where they want to live. Commute time is a huge factor in housing decisions.
Most cities in the US don't have any alternatives beside driving, nor almost any choices for a place to live other than a downtown apartment or a single-family home. Moreover, because of the latter fact, most people don't necessarily have the ability to live where they want, because such housing is so low density and drives up prices. Infrastructure for anything other than cars is completely ignored. So what are all these alternatives people supposedly have?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link