This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The original usage of "anti catholic" in this thread referred simply to a group created solely to mock a group of Catholics. This is hardly pro-Catholic, is it? I think you are attempting to make the phrase "anti Catholic" both stronger and more specific than it really is in order to say that that usage of the phrase was incorrect.
But surely the original claim was that the group's "anti-Catholicism" was extreme enough that there is something improper about the Dodgers honoring them for their charitable work.* If the claim is merely that they make fun of nuns, then who cares?
*You refer to them as "a group created solely to mock a group of Catholics." That might have been the original intent 44 years ago, but it is pretty clearly not what the organization is about now, judging by the evidence on their website. And of course they are being honored for their current work, not for whatever they were doing more than four decades ago.
Surely if the point was to honor them for their charitable work, there are much more deserving recipients of that honor. In essence a large, nominally red-tribe organization is going out of its way to honor an unambiguously deep blue tribe, and arguably quite toxic and political, organization. Given that other organizations are better at charity work etc., the toxicity of their choice seems to be rather the point.
This is the 10th or so Pride Night that the Dodgers have held, so I am sure they are running a bit low on potential recipients.
I sincerely doubt that the team views the world in terms of tribes.
How do you know that other organizations are better at charity work in the LGBTQ community?
As noted several times, there seems to be no evidence that they take any political stands at all. So how are they arguably a political organization?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link