site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 22, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

10
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can believe that you've seen not-black people use the a-variant in front of black people without issue. My prior is that they were close friends.

Your first link opens with a number of statements about how the author views white people using the a-variant as strongly objectionable, even in the most innocent of contexts, even singing along to a song by themselves in private, with the reaction ranging from the instant souring of personal relationships to a prompt resort to physical violence, which the author views as appropriate. Their analysis repeatedly loops back to considerations of context, with no amount of context actually making the use innocuous in the author's view. Their conclusion is that the taboo is probably weakening in wider society, and they are deeply ambivalent about that.

Previously, you've linked to an example of a black person using the word in a public context, which caused significant controversy.

Your second link is paywalled, but from the blurb, it seems to be a story about how personal relationships with people allowed a level of intimacy where an otherwise-taboo interaction became something to bond over. Presuming that's a fair description, I don't think it supports your thesis.

The third article is attempting to engage with the obvious craziness of enforcing the taboo on a word the enforcers use constantly in extremely popular cultural products. It likewise contains numerous references to how, under current conditions, the taboo absolutely exists and is strongly enforced. This likewise does not seem to support your thesis, any more than it would to point to the "n-word pass" meme, where supposedly black kids sell white kids a promissory note for use of the word.

None of this changes the fact that if I have a positive interaction with a black stranger, and exclaim "my man!", nothing will happen, but if I exclaim "my ***a!", I have vastly increased my odds of having a very, very bad time, not least because, even if the event were video recorded, it's entirely possible for either the black stranger or subsequent viewers to perceive the hard-r anyway.

More generally, does this conversation seem productive from your end?

My prior is that they were close friends.

They were not. I saw it many, many times in the halls of a large comprehensive high school, and as far as I could tell most times the people involved were not even acquainted, let alone close friends. The first time was a good 20 years ago, and I was just as surprised then as you are now, but it pretty soon became clear that it was the norm. Which of course is not to say that Ibram Kendi and his ilk would object; I am talking about regular black people.

I don't know why the second link it paywalled, but it discusses the difference between "nigger" and "nigga" and how the use of the former by white people is common and only sometimes objectionable: "Fact is, there is a difference between both words and only with the latter are lines blurred on the acceptableness of use by non-blacks. Yeah, it'd be great if no white person ever said "nigga," but that's unrealistic, and part of the blame falls to black people. We made the word cool. We use it incessantly in the most popular music. We took away its racist connotations so effectively that it's gotten to the point where some white people call each other "nigga" as a term of endearment."

None of this changes the fact that if I have a positive interaction with a black stranger, and exclaim "my man!", nothing will happen, but if I exclaim "my ***a!", I have vastly increased my odds of having a very, very bad time, not least because, even if the event were video recorded, it's entirely possible for either the black stranger or subsequent viewers to perceive the hard-r anyway.

I guess I don't understand why the fact that he might mishear you as saying "nigger" rather than "nigga" says anything about the acceptability of the latter. If anything, doesn't it imply that it is acceptable? If it weren't, him mishearing you would be irrelevant, would it not?

More generally, does this conversation seem productive from your end?

I don't understand the question. I am not the one who brought up the issue. It was another commenter, who made the claim that "nigger" is not offensive because black people use it among themselves. I have no idea how that ir relevant, but that same commenter said, "I'm going down the list of slurs in my head, and can't think of a single one that says a specific negative thing about anybody[,]" so I have no idea where he is coming from.