This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Imagine you're riding home on the train, you're tired, and you need a seat. You spot an empty seat, but there's a guy standing next to it who stops you from claiming the seat. The guy says he's already called dibs on the seat, even though he got up from the seat 40 minutes ago, and has been hanging around for 40 minutes not using the seat, but also not allowing anyone else to have the seat because he might feel like sitting down again. Would you consider this reasonable behavior, or would you call the guy a cunt? What would you call him if you were elderly, or pregnant? How long do you have to wait until it's no longer "his seat"?
I'm familiar with Darrell Owens from rw twitter hatereading his Substack, and his reasonable summary is predictably just an extension of his belief that black people are the protagonists of America, with everyone else existing only to accommodate them. He's from San Francisco, and back when there was a spate of black people assaulting and even murdering Asian women and elders on the streets of SF, he wrote a Substack explaining that Asians need to understand how angry black people are about immigrants gentrifying SF and voting against progressive politics. He's not a serious person. He's a "black intellectual", and like most black intellectuals, his intellectualism takes the form of projecting his own beliefs onto the actions and motivations of low-IQ lumpenproles who are often simply acting out of malice and entitlement rather than any political convictions.
More options
Context Copy link