site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 25, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You'll get a better quality discussion if you present the stronger version of an argument. If that's such a dumb argument and missing context, why didn't you add that in your top level post? ಠ_ಠ

Good point. Set aside Bernie's worthless statement about Wegovy costing only $5 to make, which ignores the immense cost of research and regulatory compliance.

Let's say that Americans paid the same price for medication as Germans do. The pharma industry would no longer be profitable and drug development would slow to a crawl. Why must the entire global pharma industry be dependent on a single country with less than 5% of the world's population? How do we make Germans pay their fair share?

Because America by being willing to pay 1000 more is showing they value it at that price. And they can value it at that price because they are richer.

In theory the best pricing practice for companies is to sell their product at 100 bucks to people who will pay that, then 60 to whover will pay that and then 40 and so on, down to where the price still creates profit per unit. In practice that is tricky because fluctuating prices is something direct consumers don't like. But when selling to different countries you can set your prices depending on what the local market will bear in each one.

So the US pays more because it is richer and therefore is willing to pay more. That is the market signal the companies are following. And arguably the US is richer because it interferes in market signals less than other countries.

In that case asking about paying their fair share is looking at the question the wrong way round. How do you get Germany to be richer so that they too value the product equally is the more accurate question. And the answer would seem to be, promote more free market principles.

Of course if Germany gets richer that may have other knock on effects on the US economy. No free lunches here unfortunately.