Capital_Room
rather dementor-like
Disabled Alaskan Monarchist doomer
User ID: 2666
Who would rule?
It doesn't matter. Power can be contested and fought over and whites looted, oppressed, pogrommed, etc.
So we have a "Vivek type" in charge of the Fuck Whitey Coalition for a few years, with the property and labor of whites expropriated to the primary benefit of high-caste Indians, then an internal power struggle puts the "African" faction in the ascendancy, and we get one of them in charge of the Fuck Whitey Coalition, and the expropriated property and labor of whites goes mostly to the blacks for a bit. Then his lack of competence puts a mestizo Hispanic in place to depose him, so now whites are being oppressed for the benefit of mestizo Hispanics. Then a Chinese guy (with quiet CCP backing) tosses him out, and now whitey is looted to benefit the Chinese. Then he dies, and the Hispanics and blacks get into a low-level civil war — with plenty of street level ethnic violence — for a bit… and both sides rob Whitey for loot to fund their conflict…
Ask the Jews how power struggles over leadership in Medieval Europe worked out for them.
Edit: and it's not like you need someone to "rule" for people to deal with murderous cannibals living among them. (See also this).
Capital_Room
rather dementor-like
1d ago
Balkanization is far more likely.
And how did things go for the minority groups in the Balkans… and how would they have probably ended up if outside powers hadn't intervened?
Blacks and browns are not going to align with Asians and Indians.
Sure they will; the same way Genghis Khan united the warring, feuding, fractious Mongol clans: by providing a common enemy to fight… and plunder.
This is a point Steve Sailer has been reiterating for a couple decades now: that "hating whitey" is the "KKKrazy glue holding together the Coalition of the Fringes." I see no reason for it to become less effective as the white demographic shrinks… and thus becomes easier to kick around and loot.
All those groups moved to America because they liked what white people built even if it was just economic migration.
Because they liked it, or because they want to loot it?
They have little common beliefs amongst them.
But they do have the common belief that the white man is evil and screwing them over, so do they need anything more?
I keep encountering this argument, that as whites become a smaller and minority, we'll never have anything to fear; that even when we're down to 10% or less of the population, we can never face any real oppression, because the majority will be too diverse, divided, and busy fighting each other to ever do anything to us. I've encountered it here more than once.
And it's nonsense. Ahistorical nonsense.
To give the most obvious example how, apply this argument to Jews in Medieval Europe. The Teutonic Knights are fighting the Kingdom of Poland, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and the Novgorod Republic — and vice versa — and they all hate each other, so the Jews are perfectly safe. Those people are all too busy warring with each other to commit any pogroms, don't you know?
Or look at diaspora Chinese in Southeast Asia. (Read Lee on what he had to deal with in Singapore.)
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. And groups that hate each other have had no problems, historically, in dishing out the abuse to minorities — especially materially-successful "middleman minority" types — they both hate.
Capital_Room
rather dementor-like
2d ago
I don’t think this country can have a non-assimilated Latino population and continue to function.
Depends on what you mean by "function." We can probably maintain Brazilian levels of "functional" under such conditions, at least for awhile. (As a South African guest on one of the podcasts I listen to put it, the US has already become Brazil, Brazil is becoming South Africa, South Africa is becoming Haiti, and the whole chain will continue down to the inevitable outcome of Global Haiti.)
This halftime show (as well as last year) is anti white propaganda and it’s starting to make normies absolutely furious.
So what? What does it matter how furious they get, as they sit and impotently stew in their fury, doing nothing?
but history doesn’t take kindly to minorities making the majority feel unsafe and unwelcome.
Assuming whites are still the majority — plenty of people in my social circles believe we're already a minority (the "official figures" being deliberate lies from a hostile government, the actual number of illegal immigrants being at least an order of magnitude higher…).
Edit: And it's not just some of us "far-right crazies" saying we're the minority now. As Democrat Gene Wu, minority leader of the Texas House of Representatives, said in an interview a couple months ago:
"The day the Latino, African American, Asian and other communities realize that they share the same oppressor is the day we start winning, because we are the majority in this country now, we have the ability to take over this country and to do what is needed for everyone and to make things fairer."
(Emphasis added.)
Nonsense. I mean, not even most "white supremacists" of my acquaintance think that whites are so superior that they can overcome any numerical disadvantage, no matter how huge. I mean, consider a scenario where whites have shrunk to about 100 people, against 8 billion+ non-whites — including quite a few intelligent and technologically-competent people (like the East Asians). Are you saying that so long as those hundred whites are "united," they'll triumph despite the > 80-million-to-one disparity?
And besides, as the Dreaded Jim likes to say, whites are wolves to whites. We aren't united, and we won't be united. Even when we're 5% or less of the American population.
More options
Context Copy link