My usual recommendation for this kind of thing is to look for stuff you can pirate that US grads are using. Most US speciality boards have at least on killer app or test prep book. Easy to nab on Libgen or whatever.
Obviously might end up with different areas of focus but overall should get the job done?
Yes this is always my plan - straight to PT. Obviously I have more information which makes things a bit easier for me.
In the U.S. you do need to ensure your insurance will allow this, but a local PT can usually help walk you through that.
it really shouldn't taste like fried rice
You mean like....good?
I think I'm just expecting it to taste like fried rice and it doesn't. Might be an expectation thing.
.... I think I'm just a heathen, I've been to the few places in the US with legit stuff and still meh
And if I recall correctly the author is an actual straight up SneerClub poster.
beyond a fondness for biryani.
Can you change my view that Biryani is just crappy fried rice?
The more healthy hospitals I've worked in have often had residents (and sometimes attendings) cross lecture - psychiatry explains capacity, surgery comes to IM to explain wound case basics etc.
If you feel like tilting at windmills its a nice thing to try.
The meme in the U.S. is that the majority of Psych (and to a lesser extent Neuro) consults are inappropriate. Both tend to get Delirium/TME consults for which the recommendation is "fix the underlying medical problem" (with a side helping of "no this 85 year old grandma does not have late onset schizophrenia). Psych also gets capacity consults - any physician can determine capacity and should be able to do so unless something weird is going on. You call Psych if mental illness is complicating things only.
by making someone in California have like 10x less say than the same person in Mississippi in Congress and the presidency.
The Electoral College prevents a small number of influential and high population urban centers with views that may be broadly considered alien from running a country most of the size of a continent. It is likely responsible for quite a bit of US stability.
Look at the Hunger Games, where a large capital dictates unpopular policy to the other regions.
It's likely we would have significant ongoing issues with places like Texas trying to leave if California was in charge.
The EC allows the federal government to have teeth without a shit ton of civil wars.
The American founding fathers were some of the most brilliant and successful political theorists in the history of mankind. Don't throw out the political technologies they invented because it has been recently expedient.
Oh there's no rush. Get well soon.
Oh no, I was guessing that ED was the rotation.
Why is your CL service busy? Do your surgeons not understand how capacity works?*
*This insult of European surgeons not guaranteed to match the medico-legal requirements of British healthcare.
Pshh skip the meet cute hoss, I want to know what the rotation is.
Busy......Emergency?
I think this is a really stellar comment!
To your point about culture, I do think part of it might be that society sees Internet activity as not really being "real" social interaction, even though hanging out on a forum is probably filling the same psychological need that hanging out at a pub would've done.
Absolutely, any para-social or other unconventional socialization is still socialization. Assessments aren't really updated to reflect this (well, for the most part).
If you are the kind of person who is posting here you may appreciate and benefit from interrogating your own personality in an organized way - maybe figure out why you are this way, maybe to see if it's what you truly want. If that's the case...chase the thread.
Not doing so is perfectly cromulent however, especially because learning about yourself can be an info hazard that can't be put back in the bottle.
Hopefully he's just on a new rotation :/
I think this is a good time to take stock of your stances on things and go "do I really think this is a good/bad idea or am I just responding reflexively because of Trump."
By all accounts the lack of a proper presidential ballroom has been considered a minor national embarrassment for years... but people in D.C. just don't want Trump to be in charge of fixing the problem. That level of petty vindictiveness isn't a surprise, but it shouldn't really be supported, and if you speak to the relevant officials I'd bet money that most of them only oppose it to salve their constituents and not out of genuine belief. Supporting the worst impulses of the populace isn't always wise.
On top of that we have the current issue. Imagine if you were nearly killed in a plane crash or in the hospital, and the Swiss Cheese model successfully prevented the bad outcome. Do think the response to a "near miss" is to leave everything as is? No, we make improvements to close the hole, to avoid the risk of multiple holes lining up next time.
Blessedly the system didn't totally fail. That's not a reason to make no adjustments.
A few things moving in parallel here:
-
The explanation as to what a personality disorder or personality is is a long lecture at absolute minimum. It's a complicated concept with very specific (and for some dimensions debated) meanings. Takeaway: It may be reasonable to go "meh" in response to labels.
-
Schizoid personality disorder is one of the most poorly understood diagnostic entities in medicine. Patients essentially never present for psychiatric care because they don't see the need (and unlike say anti-social PD, they don't otherwise live their lives in a way that gets them attention). To my understanding the only reason why we know anything at all about this diagnosis is for historical reasons (it was thought to be a pre-morbid state for schizophrenia and was therefore very heavily explored, once we figured out that wasn't the case we stopped expending excess resources on trying to spot it and it went away*). Non-psychiatric medical providers see these patients far more than psychiatrists (since they do still require medical care). Takeaway: I'm not sure really this label means anything or requires anything.
-
The internal and external expression of the self is heavily impacted by culture and environment. Takeaway: I'm not sure a diagnosis that primarily served to describe behaviors in a wildly different social milieu totally applies to modern heavily atomized culture.
-
Asking this question is suggestive of the diagnosis not being relevant - satisfaction with the state of affairs is hallmark of the diagnosis.
-
Regardless of any of the above and anything related to the diagnosis - it is totally reasonable to have questions about your self, your preferences. Some people are fine with being solitary. Some people are being solitary as a defense mechanism. Some people are fine with being solitary as a defense mechanism. It is hard to explore these things by yourself, and in a situation where you don't have a lot of external entities to help you, a therapist or other professional way to organize and explore yourself is totally reasonable.
*not 100% sure on this.
I mean that's not unfair. Mark is a serious person who has been to many, many of these types of events. On the other hand he's a journalist not a security expert, and security experts usually decline to aggressively comment on these types of events.
I'd say on the face of it it doesn't seem well secured, especially with some of the semi-public details (security started inside the building, movement was restricted to the presence of a generic hotel key sleeve, etc.).
Thankfully the people interested in doing this kind of stuff are generally idiots but that doesn't save us from sufficiently motivated state actors should that become relevant.
I've clocked at least one smart person engaged in domestic terrorism in the U.S. in an intelligent way, and I suspect there are more they just don't get noticed, caught, or publicly emphasized. I'm sure the TLAs are aware, however.
I don't think it is a significant leap to mention the importance of keeping our head of state safe while we are in a shooting war with a nation whose head of state we killed and that has espoused direct desire to kill our head of state.
We are at literally kinetic war with an adversary that spends a lot of time and money on assassinations and terrorism..........
I mean you have credible people making comments. Mark Halperin (who is usually very calm and measured) complaining is why I made this post.
Usually people with knowledge don't publicly comment because you don't want to create -ideas- but this time a lot of people were close by and in the splash zone and are pissed.
Much as I'd love to blame it on that I don't think so. This wasn't individual agents being unfit or stupid, this was top down problems.
To add to this, if you are young and have unconventional opinions it can be very easy to not have anyone to share them with, especially these days.
This makes them not very battle tested.
- Prev
- Next

As per your link the restrictions include things like:
"A therapist who has more than one year of experience supervises any therapists licensed for less than one year."
And:
"The therapist thinks the care is within his or her scope. If a therapist thinks the care is outside of his or her scope, he or she must refer the patient to an appropriate healthcare provider."
How are these unreasonable?
Insurance is more likely to prove a barrier.
More options
Context Copy link