Rov_Scam
3d ago
I worked for an inventory service in college and we used machines that were nothing but a numerical keypad with a one-line LCD display, and asa result I'm one of the few people whose typing is mediocre but can scream on the keypad—I use it almost every time I need to put a number in, even if I'm typing something. So I couldn't imagine having a keyboard without one. To be fair, some laptops don't, which incidentally included the ones the supervisor used to download the data and run the reports, so they carried a usb keypad with them to make manual entry easier.
Rov_Scam
3d ago
Alt + 0151 will produce an em dash in whatever program you're using. Alt + 0150 will produce an en dash if you're brave enough to use it.
Rov_Scam
6d ago
The Supreme Court just ruled unanimously that the CRA is not a one-way street, and the same standards apply regardless of whether the plaintiff is a member of a minority group.
Rov_Scam
6d ago
For al milquetoast speaker the media networks memorializing him are suspiciously avoiding showing clips of him saying anything.
Rov_Scam
6d ago
You can talk about edge cases all you want, but there's a Chesterton's Fence element here too. Hostile work environment doctrine was introduced to prevent employers from evading discrimination laws by, say, hiring black people but making fun of them for their race at work so that blacks simply wouldn't want to work there. "You can work here, but it will be hell" doesn't exactly advance the aims of the Civil Rights Act. You can argue that in some instances courts have gone too far, but you can do that with respect to any doctrine. When discussing tradeoffs, guys being able to look at porn at work isn't going to win against making it difficult for women to be employed there.
Rov_Scam
6d ago
Maybe, but it's hard to tell. If I'm an employer I have reasons for not wanting employees to tell nigger jokes at work or request blowjobs from female staff regardless of the liability situation, and as a matter of public policy we don't want employers to encourage the above as an end-around to avoid anti discrimination laws. The law involves tradeoffs, and most people's desire to bring politics into non-political jobs, or hear about other people's politics, is outweighed by the desire to prevent real discrimination. Talking about the apparatus of oppression only makes sense in this instance if you're talking about the employer's interest, because there's no free speech guarantee when you're on somebody else's time.
Rov_Scam
6d ago
And you think that if the hostile work environment doctrine were removed then you'd feel free to speak your views? Or is this just the zeitgeist among people you happen to work for?
Rov_Scam
6d ago
What do you want to say at work that you think you're being prevented from saying because of potential employer liability under "hostile work environment" standards? What makes you think than your employer would have no problem with you saying that even if the potential liability didn't exist?
Rov_Scam
7d ago
It's not so much that they got bombed as it is the circumstances. If Israel bombs a country nobody likes or even is neutral about, it's a minor news item. It's different when they bomb a US ally with whom we have various agreements involving keeping a military base in their country and selling them advanced weapons. Even in the absence of a mutual defense agreement, one would expect that a "key strategic ally" would get more than a warning that another country would attack them.
Rov_Scam
7d ago
You might say that but I doubt the American government or indeed the American public would feel the same way. Media would report it as the only time the US mainland has ever been bombed and the first bombing of US territory since WWII. We would respond militarily, even if it was just a Doolittle-style raid to show we could do it.
Rov_Scam
7d ago
There seems to be a fundamental difference, though, between a traditional assassination and one using military means. If a foreign actor shot someone on American soil for political reasons it's different than them sending their air force in and bombing their house. One is a criminal act, the other an act of war.
Rov_Scam
7d ago
For a trained sniper, no, but I doubt the assassin was a trained sniper. For the typical guy with a scoped rifle who hunts deer a few weeks out of the year, anything beyond 100 yards is dicey enough that they'll think twice about taking the shot.
Rov_Scam
7d ago
This isn't a change in anything. There will always be a certain number of people on either side of the aisle who will celebrate violence against the other side, and the only thing that's different now than 15 years ago is that more of them are on the internet by virtue of fewer of them being too old to go on Reddit. I couldn't tell you the number of crabby old guys in bars who talked openly about the "ten cent solution" during the Obama presidency.
Rov_Scam
9d ago
I understand as much as I understand that none of these scenarios involving population bombs ever happen. I'd be willing to bet any amount of money that there will be at least 1 million Han Chinese in 100 years, which is more than double the population of Amish at present, a population that's doing incredibly well by your metrics.
Rov_Scam
10d ago
I guess next you'd also tell them that they can't take credit risk into account when issuing loans.
Rov_Scam
10d ago
I don't know that bringing up one of the largest countries in the world is a great idea when talking about a "death sentence" for an ethnicity.
Rov_Scam
12d ago
Not really. Most medical records I look at have too much information, not too little, and that appears to be a consequence of computer programs that make it really easy to generate a ton of data ever yfive minutes. Office notes are usually pretty good, but if the guy was in the hospital it seems like they provide daily updated medication lists and ongoing reports of vital signs. Plus the complete record includes all the discharge instruction for how to care for your wound, etc.
Rov_Scam
13d ago
I look at a lot of medical records for work, and what was posted is the evidentiary equivalent of damning with faint praise; unless there's more that isn't shown here, it's evidence that there was no injury. First, the entire time from sign-in to discharge was about 90 minutes, which has to be some kind of record. In the US the average wait time is 2 1/2 hours, and that includes people who are seen immediately. Maybe the NHS is better about this than the hospitals where I live, but given their reputation and the fact that this was 8 pm on a Saturday... it seems a bit of a stretch. And there's no indication that this girl was treated or even examined. Just a note of head injury and that she was discharged home without followup. Again, I don't know, maybe the NHS just doesn't bother to document anything, but in the US I'd expect a brief narrative of how the injury happened plus physical exam findings plus a diagnosis and any instructions they were given at discharge. Here, even the stuff that looks like it should be filled in is left blank.
My own take, made with the full admission that I have no special knowledge of the situation and am not a doctor and with the caveat that the records I look that are the ones the hospital has and not necessarily the ones the patient would automatically be given upon discharge,is that they went to the ER and complained of a head injury to the triage nurse, got tired of waiting, and left. Maybe @self_made_human can shed some light on what standard practices are considering that he might be a doctor at the same hospital and would at least be familiar with Scottish medical records, but assuming they're substantially similar to American records, I'm not seeing much here.
Rov_Scam
13d ago
I haven't seen any evidence that this guy is a Turk beyond speculation by people who aren't in a position to know. Last week people were insisting he was a Gypsy.
Rov_Scam
13d ago
It works well enough to get an idea of what kind of crimes are occurring and where, but without names it's useless for my purposes. It's also based on reports of crimes not arrests, so if a guy breaks into a building and is arrested a week later at home it's going to map to the building he broke into and not his house. Believe me, I checked that site on the off chance there was a report for the address, but I already suspected that wasn't the case since the other tenants didn't have any information. It's more likely that he was picked up on a warrant for something that happened elsewhere.
Rov_Scam
13d ago
I picked up an eviction case over the summer, and I got a call from my client one morning telling me that the tenant had been arrested. He didn't know what for, just that he had heard about it from other tenants in the building. A couple weeks later, it happened again, and this time he had to fix the door from them breaking in. I told him I had no idea how to figure out why he was arrested (twice), for the simple reason that I didn't have any connections in the police department, and that even if I did they would only be useful if one of them happened to already know about the situation. The only way to figure out why the guy was arrested is to wait and see if he's charged in court, and to date the guy's only contact with the court system has been the suit I filed against him. The other possible way would be to check the police blotter. This is a reasonable course of action in small towns that report every traffic stop, but the Pittsburgh Police, with hundreds of encounters a day, only report on things serious enough to merit general public interest, and some middle aged guy getting arrested for something that's probably minor doesn't merit it. There's a Pittsburgh Police Scanner twitter account run by private citizens monitoring scanners, but, again, they only report on things interesting or (mostly) funny.
Rov_Scam
14d ago
I don't think this is true because the population isn't evenly distributed as far as teams are concerned. Here in Western PA, if you're black and good at football you're likely playing on teams that are majority black all the way through high school, the same being true of white students. And at the high school level, the racial composition of teams isn't a factor in how competitive they are. If you're white and good at football you're not getting cut in middle school in favor of precocious black kid for the simple reason that there probably aren't enough black kids to make a difference.
I suck on phone keypads generally, so yes,. though my phone keypad isn't laid out like you're suggesting.
More options
Context Copy link