@3472094371's banner p
BANNED USER: Ban evading alt created to be an asshole

3472094371


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2025 July 25 19:50:24 UTC

				

User ID: 3840

Banned by: @Amadan

BANNED USER: Ban evading alt created to be an asshole

3472094371


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2025 July 25 19:50:24 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 3840

Banned by: @Amadan

Great many things, I'll be here all night if I start. But this conversation is specifically about the rent-seeking cartel that just so happens to be the most optimal possible arrangement according to you.

Is an IRS accountant a person who helps deal with the IRS or a person who works for the IRS? If it's the latter, I would find him almost as morally bankrupt as a doctor.

Human mind is remarkable in rationalizing appalling circumstances and morally bankrupt institutions that profit us.

So that's how it looks from the inside.

Thank you for providing a demonstration for the necessity of the third point of the plan.

If someone has Othello syndrome and makes their partner so annoyed that they end up cheating, does that retroactively invalidate the diagnosis?

In a timeless perspective there is no non-cheating female, so the answer is yes.

The first time I won a game of the first part was with a huge deck and a card that depended on the deck size. I remember that because it coincided with the "huge d[i]ck energy" meme and I found that funny. Other than that, keep it slim.

Either way the fact that everyone is disagreeing with you should indicate it's a you problem.

Freedom_of_speech.jpg

Before the 18th century?

#YesAllWomen

You can't escape collective responsibility once you pinned one on us.

if this is how any relationship you've been is functions then you need to get out of it, that's madness

I definitely got out of the relationship business after a couple of attempts. Nowadays, even aided by me being borderline broke, where I couldn't get back even if I wanted to. Which I don't.

If I were in your physical space right now, my day might just be about to get a lot worse.

Your previous message was a thinly veiled accusation of domestic abuse levelled at me, but I can't decipher what you're saying in this message.

I invite you to show me a study confirming this surprising claim!

We live in the post-"Racism is the greatest health threat" world. Fuck studies.

Often people's social bubbles extend to the workplace and are at least partially geographic in nature.

Talk about falsifiability, just move half a continent away, bro.

If you're always ending up with women who are crazy bitches, there are reasons for that, too, and it's not "because all women are crazy bitches, duh".

I don't end up with women anymore. Fuck that noise, sex is not enough of a compensation for that shit in my life.

while yours seem to be primarily backed by people from internet forums

False. I turned to the internet forums to explain what I observed, not the other way around.

that doesn't necessarily make its outlook particularly more applicable to people on this forum

If I ever implied I'm talking about this self-selected place rather than the general population, I did so unintentionally and mistakenly.

But this would be strange, since misery tends to led to stress, which in turn leaves to poor health outcomes.

I don't believe either part. Miserable beaten down people are not stressed. Hateful geriatrics in poverty often live the longest.

Possibly this is your preferences, but you might also be in a bubble.

Unlikely, since the majority of the examples I'm thinking about are only tangential acquaintances, from workplaces, from previous generations, etc.

In what shouldn't be this way my attitude towards the opponent sex doesn't rank in the top ten. There are many things in my life which need to be better and by that I mean at the level I previously enjoyed, money to not depend on their benevolence is number one.

Pass me the console command.

they need to work out why they are dating/involved with crazy bitches all the time

Because of heterosexuality.

Functional relationships? Vampires, toxoplasmosis, cordyceps, or the fucking red pill. Pick your metaphor, there are plenty.

Yes. Those were mistakes.

And some people are naive.

It is conceivable, and deep inside I would even relish it, but in a Bayesian fashion it would need to be so overwhelmingly adhering to my ideal, with my knowledge so voyeuristically comprehensive, that it's frankly unrealistic.

Funny, it always have been the female figures of my life who love to take out their frustrations on others. From education and employment authorities to any of the meager number of my serious relationships to the early memories of confusion of how my mother treated me badly after being angry with my father about what I as an adult am sure was some trivial useless shit. Inb4 a chorus of armchair psychoanalysts piping up how this explains everything, Freud this, social script that, no, fuck it, I haven't observed anyone female behaving differently even at a distance ever.

I have considered it and I have rejected it. Have you considered that if you're not lying you're in a unusually functional relationship?