ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
17hr ago
The abolition of segregation wasn't 'handing the reins of society over' to the Civil Rights advocates.
The pro-trans side is not asking for the abolition of segregation. They want to keep it, but hop over to the "white" category.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
21hr ago
The re-casting was how they sought to thwart the goal of the pro-trans faction.
It wasn't recasting. Prior to to pro-trans proposition , everybody was using a sex-based distinction. Even the word "gender" was just a euphemism for sex. The anti-trans side just adapted to the pro-trans lingo to try to have a meaningful conversation, and not fight over definitions.
and avoid anyone asking why they are concerned with other people's anatomy.
That makes no sense, no one on the anti-trans side has an issue answering that question. We're a sexually dimorphic species, and the dimorphism manifests itself in both behavior and physical capabilities.
and the biological differences would be as private as any other medical history, HIPAA avant la lettre.
Can't say I noticed the pro-trans side wanting to keep their genitals private.
You're moving the goalposts. Obviously the pro-trans side will think the pro-trans side is right, and vice versa. We were talking about whether or not the anti-trans side was recasting the distinction raised by the pro-trans side. If the anti-trans side was the first to set the distinction, than it was the pro-trans side that was doing the recasting. Even if you think their position is the correct / morally right one.
I appreciate the concession, but I'm not willing to grant even this bit.
More options
Context Copy link