The main focus of my arguments on this topic is simply Energy Returned on Energy Invested. Financial viability is a fairly good proxy for whether or not a given source of energy provides enough of a return to make its exploitation viable.
That's not what I'd call focusing on Energy Returned on Energy Invested, that's focusing on financials, claiming, but never proving, it's a good proxy, and calling it a day. Make the case in KWh, and we might get somewhere.
That's not what I'd call focusing on Energy Returned on Energy Invested, that's focusing on financials, claiming, but never proving, it's a good proxy, and calling it a day. Make the case in KWh, and we might get somewhere.
More options
Context Copy link