ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
The abolition of segregation wasn't 'handing the reins of society over' to the Civil Rights advocates.
The pro-trans side is not asking for the abolition of segregation. They want to keep it, but hop over to the "white" category.
The re-casting was how they sought to thwart the goal of the pro-trans faction.
It wasn't recasting. Prior to to pro-trans proposition , everybody was using a sex-based distinction. Even the word "gender" was just a euphemism for sex. The anti-trans side just adapted to the pro-trans lingo to try to have a meaningful conversation, and not fight over definitions.
and avoid anyone asking why they are concerned with other people's anatomy.
That makes no sense, no one on the anti-trans side has an issue answering that question. We're a sexually dimorphic species, and the dimorphism manifests itself in both behavior and physical capabilities.
and the biological differences would be as private as any other medical history, HIPAA avant la lettre.
Can't say I noticed the pro-trans side wanting to keep their genitals private.
Yes. This is the steelman / nugget of truth in the EHC idea, but in practice "populists can't attract EHC" is a personal complaint at not being wined and dined by the plebs.
Because they're Elite Human Capital, duh. They think they're all that, and populists not seeing their worth is evidence of how incapable they are.
The term was popularized by Walt Bismarck, an Alt-Right guy who, in the wake of the Charlottesville crashout, went to some all-white small town, and later wrote a substack seething about the normies there not being interested in his brand of politics. I think one of our posters even found the article, and was indirectly responsible for it going viral. Later it was picked up by people like Richard Hanania, and Alexander Turok.
they lack the intelligence and positive vision for the future necessary to attract "elite human capital".
Elites don’t demand either of those things
You're mixing up terminology here. The elites are people with actual power. "Elite human capital" are a bunch of influencers with status anxiety, a Joffrey Baratheon complex, and a hate boner for populism.
Moreover, there's an opposing force: depending on who's in charge of the government, it can violate federal law to not act, with a bunch of fun questions when those regulations change after the action or inaction happens
The problem with that idea is that by forcing the doctors to provide treatment, politicians will be taking ownership of the entire scandal. Which can be fine if the treatment is actually good for people, and the odd malcontent is just a result of occasional incompetence or weird allergies. If, on the other hand, it's bad, politicians will have tied their own rope.
The idea reminds me of some Reddit post I saw, where transgenders were gloating that their doctor got around some red state ban by using the ICD code for an endocrine disorder, instead of gender dysphoria. Good for them, I guess. I totally can't imagine how this could come back and bite the doctor in the ass.
Yes, they are being forced to. We know this because the only reason the law even came about is became they double backed on their own promises to release the files to begin with.
That's not exactly the own you think it is. It's hard act outraged about Trump only releasing them when he was forced to by his own promise, when the other party was in a position to release them for years, but didn't, and didn't even promise to.
- Prev
- Next

You're moving the goalposts. Obviously the pro-trans side will think the pro-trans side is right, and vice versa. We were talking about whether or not the anti-trans side was recasting the distinction raised by the pro-trans side. If the anti-trans side was the first to set the distinction, than it was the pro-trans side that was doing the recasting. Even if you think their position is the correct / morally right one.
I appreciate the concession, but I'm not willing to grant even this bit.
More options
Context Copy link