ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
56m ago
Note also how for the anti-Semite, each and every Jew is responsible for whatever is said by every other Jew.
A general statement about a group does not imply even it's dissenting members are held accountable for the majority opinion.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1hr ago
Come up with a better name for it, if you want, the dynamic seems the same, and the point was to show that saying a reaction was caused by something, does not actually justify the reaction, unlike what you were claiming.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1hr ago
Doesn't this strongly suggest that Group A's antipathy towards Group B really has nothing to do with Activity X, and it's just a convenient pretext to ostracise a group they wanted to harass for unrelated reasons?
You could say that activity X has nothing to do with it, but not in the way you wish to imply. The actual issue was the dynamic where an activity is seen as corrosive to society by both groups, so one of them bans it universally, and the other bans it only within the ingroup. I don't know how you can claim it's a "convenient pretext", one group is clearly defecting, and has no right to whine about their defection being recognized as such.
The activity being no longer recognized as harmful due to changing socio-economic circumstances does not change the fact that one of the groups was defecting. And even though that particular activity is no longer controversial, the defection dynamic causing the conflict is still observable today.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
18hr ago
It’s wild to me how quickly this must’ve changed
We literally discussed it in one of the CW threads back on Reddit.
By majority-supporting progressive policies for other nations, while opposing them for their own communities.
More options
Context Copy link