ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626

She objects specifically to bullying and cruelty.
Can you give an example of either? I haven't seen anything that I would consider crossing into bullying or cruelty territory.
I don't think people should obsess over her, stalk her,
No one is stalking her, she had to google her name herself to even come across the content that upset her. Obsessing over someone probably isn't healthy, but it's not bullying or cruelty either.
regularly post vicious comments about her. Just disapprove, ignore, and get on with life.
Why? It's completely normal to comment on the public behavior of very public people, and there's nothing "viscious" about that, even if the comments are negative.
If she wants people to keep their disapproval private, she can keep her behavior private.
...because regime change wars clearly worked out so great for us in the past...
Iran is also not at war with the US, so the US could do that too, if it wanted.
That doesn't seem to work out very well for them, other countries suck and all of their people want to come to America
Same was true for Rome vs non-Roman Europe, but it didn't stop the empire from collapsing.
Well, I did actually get tinkering time this week, but not much to report. I did manage to chip away at the retarded performance of my db queries, but will have to continue to do so, and what's more I will also have to go through the same process for importing content.
How are things on your end, @Southkraut?
Breaking news: Trump
Why, after all these years, can't we learn a simple lesson such as: wait two weeks before even beginning to formulate a conclusion about "breaking news" related to Trump, especially if they originate on Twitter/Truth?
I actually warmed up to welfare over the years, though I strongly disagree with it's unconditional dispensation. In my ideal model any healthy male would need to enroll into boot-camp or equivalent conditions to get a pay-check. The conditions could be relaxed depending on one's health, but essentially, you'd have to break some sweat before you get anything. UBI and other unconditional schemes, or even the "pure formality" conditional ones, are the ultimate evil.
Christina Buttons? I think it's doable, but not under the "out and proud" model.
What, specifically, is the evil being done here? Criticizing her? Not praising her loudly enough?
Factorio would still be a banger. Creeper World would probably improve significantly.
I wasn't trying to contradict any of your reasoning. That's why I said that propaganda is what you say, and then I elaborated further on what you were missing to understand my point.
Oh ok. I thought when you said "You're approaching this from an angle where propaganda is something I don't think it is" meant that you are disagreeing with me, and that your elaboration was less "oh, we disagree less than I thought" and more "here's what you missed, and these factors is what lead you astray in your reasoning".
Fixating on the idea that the 'left' can't have a Joe Rogan, Rush Limbaugh or anyone else when the only reason such people have relevance in this context is that they are not 'left' seems asinine.
I mean, it sounds like you know exactly what I'm saying, you'd just prefer to talk about something else. Which is fine, for the future you can just say something like "yes, there are limits to what they can do, but it's more than enough for them to get what they want".
Anyway, I don't think it's asinine when they're spending so much time crying about no having a Joe Rogan. If it was not important for them, they wouldn't want to have one.
I mean, how could Rush Limbaugh have been so popular whilst laughing about gay people dying from AIDS? Why can't the left have their own radio shock jock?
They're not asking for a carbon copy of Rogan, except with leftwing opinions, they're asking for someone with the same cultural relevance.
The idea that any random male can beat every single female in every single sport in every single situation is a bizarre manosphere political cope.
Is that the idea that was being put forward? I thought we were talking averages and percentiles.
Ok bro whatever, show me the statistics that show a median 15YO girl is roughly as good as a median boy.
You don't need to hit puberty all way to beat a 15YO girl, what are you guys smoking?
Are you sure Kulak is a man?
Yes, and you need to seriously reevaluate your thinking if you ever thought this is anything other than 100% certain.
I've listened to the Kulak podcast and it's a woman's voice.
I don't know what kind of ladies you go out with, but even trans FTMs rarely go that deep.
If somewhat more athletic 15YO boys tend to win against the absolute world elite of adult women, then a girl their age is screwed. If being a full-grown adult doesn't give you enough head start to win, than starting puberty a bit earlier won't be of much help either.
Sure an athletic 15YO girl might beat a fat slob boy her age (this is also true of adult men vs. adult women), but that doesn't make 15 much of a danger zone.
Propaganda is what you say, just on a much larger timescale. With the addition of blocking certain ideas and types of thinking. You don't need to spread your message all the time. Just make sure it's the only message available.
I remained timescale agnostic in my definition, so that doesn't contradict any part of my reasoning. As for blocking ideas, there are a few ways you can do that with propaganda, but they're limited. You can spam your ideas to drown others, or you can debunk / or prebunk the ones you don't like and/or mark them as low-status, but if by "blocking" you're referring to literally preventing other ideas from reaching their audience, than I'd argue you're the one conflating concepts and "approaching this from an angle where propaganda is something I don't think it is".
They won't need to change themselves to block the next Joe Rogan
How is this a response to my point? I specifically said they won't need to change to block him.
People still play video games, people still fret about missing graphics options and bad games being sold for 60 dollars, but there's no central outlet for that like he provided
Exactly what my argument would predict.
Eh, actually 15 is still in the danger zone. Girls will have started puberty 1-2 years ahead (12-13) and so at 15 will still be ahead or apace
The adult women world champion football team is losing to the under-16 boys' teams (not even the champions) regularly.
First, police stations are state property. They are of a lesser legal status than federal property when it comes to crimes against them, is my understanding.
On the other hand, burning something down to the ground is an act of greater violence than breaking in and aimlessly walking around the premises until asked to leave. How do you know the former amounts to greater crime?
Either way the major argument I'm making is more symbolic
The symbolic argument is far more subjective, I don't see how you can insist you're obviously right with it.
There was less "violence and threats of violence against congress", and more "fumbling around a building until asked to leave". Also what they set on fire was a police station, making it more than mere property crime.
Violence committed on federal property is a bigger issue.
So... it's closer to those federal courthouses being attacked, than the police precinct being burned down?
Do you think gay conversion therapy is bad? If so, can we make it not-gay-conversion-therapy by insisting that the opposite sex partner we're trying to hook the gay person up with is actually of the same sex?
I thought you said there was a legal argument for it being worse, rather than merely symbolic?
I'm open to hearing your case. Please tell me what is the argument for setting a police station on fire being less illegal than breaking into the building of the legislature.
- Prev
- Next
And what is thus solution supposed to achieve? Europe has no birthright citizenship, and they still hand them out that stays long enough. End result is the same.
More options
Context Copy link